Science Channel
Science Channel Overview
The generated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.
Science Channel has a 1.8 star rating based on 14 customer reviews; consumers are mostly dissatisfied. Science Channel reviews and Science Channel customer complaints frequently note factual errors, loud background music, repetitive programming, concerns about billing and price level, and problems with customer service; many reviewers request an apology.
Key Takeaways for Future Customers
- Expect praised programming but watch for accuracy concerns when consulting Science Channel reviews.
- Audio mixing and repeated episodes are common issues that reduce enjoyment.
- Customers report dissatisfaction with customer service and perceived high price for content.
Negative Feedback / Risk Areas
- Frequent complaints about inaccurate or misleading information in episodes.
- Persistent reports of overly loud background music and poor sound mixing.
- Repeated programming and dated episodes frustrate viewers seeking new science content.
- Issues with customer service responsiveness and concerns linked to billing and subscriptions.
Positive Feedback
Reviewers still praise the channel for great science content and its role in exposing viewers to scientific and historical topics.
The generated data is based on reviews and questionnaires provided by PissedConsumer.com users.
Science Channel has a 1.8 star rating based on 14 customer reviews; consumers are mostly dissatisfied. Science Channel reviews and Science Channel customer complaints frequently note factual errors, loud background music, repetitive programming, concerns about billing and price level, and problems with customer service; many reviewers request an apology.
Key Takeaways for Future Customers
- Expect praised programming but watch for accuracy concerns when consulting Science Channel reviews.
- Audio mixing and repeated episodes are common issues that reduce enjoyment.
- Customers report dissatisfaction with customer service and perceived high price for content.
Negative Feedback / Risk Areas
- Frequent complaints about inaccurate or misleading information in episodes.
- Persistent reports of overly loud background music and poor sound mixing.
- Repeated programming and dated episodes frustrate viewers seeking new science content.
- Issues with customer service responsiveness and concerns linked to billing and subscriptions.
Positive Feedback
Reviewers still praise the channel for great science content and its role in exposing viewers to scientific and historical topics.
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified Reviewer |Extremely poor quality information on their volcano shows. They have stated that the most powerful eruptions have occurred in Indonesia. No mention of the super volcanoes in Yellowstone and Russia t
- - Volcano facts seem off.
- - Ash falls do not cause tsunamis.
- - Yellowstone and Russia have super volcanoes.
- - Powerful eruptions aren't only in Indonesia.
Get their facts straight. When it comes to volcanoes, they aren't even close.
More fiction than science. Ash falls do not cause tsunamis. The most powerful eruptions are not in Indonesia, to name just a couple.
How about the supervolcanoes in Yellowstone and Russia? Makes me doubt the accuracy of everything on this channel.
- No pros on their volcano shows
- Mostly inaccurate to the point of being fiction
Preferred solution: Apology
User's recommendation: Don't waste your time on the Science Channel. More fiction than science
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified ReviewerFake scripted show
You ignorant Hollywood *** that write these dumb *** scripts for these shows think it makes the show more interesting you are so out of touch with people, but it doesn't surprise me.
User's recommendation: The show would be good if not for the lame scripts.
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified ReviewerGross errors in an episode.
- - The episode contained truck-related errors.
- - FDOT rules are per axle, not tire configuration; limits: steer 12,000; drive 34,000; trailer 34,000.
You broadcast several gross errors about commercial trucks in an episode I recently watched. I'll list them for you.
1. Truckers cannot just pull off the road and go to bed.
2. Duals cannot carry more weight than super singles. The FDOT regulates how much weight is allowed per axle, not the configuration of the tires.
3. The fifth wheel is just called... the fifth wheel. It has different parts with names, none of which you mentioned at all. For instance, the skid plate on top of the fifth wheel.
So you can convey accurate and correct information in the future, tractor-trailer combination vehicles are allowed a maximum of 80,000lbs distributed as follows: steers are allowed 12,000lbs. The tractor's drive axle is allowed 34,000lbs and the trailer tandem is allowed 34,000lbs.
The next time you air an episode about tractor-trailers, I'd strongly suggest you talk to actual truckers before you make fools of yourselves again.
Preferred solution: Apology
User's recommendation: The information contained in this episode is NOT accurate.
Particles
- - User reports hearing particles through a leather jacket.
- - Phone recording may help.
- - They want contact to discuss and share recordings.
I am not a scientist.
But I think that what have recorded about the millions of particles that pass through us every day. The noise is audible to and my phone has recorded it.
I am sitting here not moving yet I hear particles passing through my jacket. Which is Leather. I can hear the things passing through my coat
The recording on my phone may help
I love science I have to say already know about this but will you please contact me.
(530)515-****
My name is wayne simpson.
I want to know and understand
More importantly is the the noise its passing through my jacket. I dont know if we can capture it.
I dont know you please call me and talk to me and I will send you the recordings. Thank you.!!
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified ReviewerProgramming
- - The Science Channel isn't science anymore.
- - Too many how it's made and peripheral topics.
- - Viewers declined; kitchenware buyers rose.
They continue, and will continue, their same lousy programming. The Science Channel should be ABOUT SCIENCE and the content is watered down.
Very little is about science - it's about manufacturing tricks, making hardware, and totally peripheral stuff LOLSo for "science" I have to turn to the internet. Broadcasting sources? Forget it!
:)Thanks.......... yves feder
Your Science Channel content is hardly ever "SCIENCE" any longer. Lots of "how it's made" and other peripheral subjects.
WHAT HAPPENED?
Do you actually get more viewers by diluting your content? What a shame. Well you have lost a lot of viewers, but maybe picked up more "consumers" who buy crap kitchenware or whatever, instead of telescopes or whatever.
Part of the dumbing down of America, I guess.
Congrats for being part of that! A shame...
Idea to use aging episodes
- - Xfinity airs aging space episodes, including Season 8, four years old.
- - Suggests updating with new findings (e.g., JWST) to refresh content.
You are broadcasting aging space information in aging episodes. Xfinity has all of them available but they are old.
To get more use out of them, you continue to broadcast them. Im watching Season 8 on right now and its 4 years old, not mention that the information is from years before. I suggest you consider using old episodes by sharing updates.
Like the 50 years ago, and Today piece in one of our favorite magazines. So, you show a part from an old episode and then explain how new information (like maybe from the James Webb) has improved our understanding and changed our theories
User's recommendation: Easy to communicate online
To get addres
Im am not a *** customer. I WOULD LIKE SCI ADDRESS to send my books that pertains to myself and Mary Magdalene.
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified ReviewerBack round music and noise
- - Loud background music makes it hard to hear speakers.
- - I watch less on your channel.
- - The channel could lead by cutting back on music.
Why do you have so much loud background music and sound on your shows? It makes it very hard to hear who is speaking.
I have come to watch much less on your channel as time goes on.
You are not the only station that does this. Maybe you could be a leader in cutting back on it.
- Very good
- To loud back round sounds
Preferred solution: Fix it
User's recommendation: Still a great channel
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified ReviewerResolved: Recent broadcast
- - I watched scientists test the Shroud on the Science Channel.
- - In 1961 I saw the Shroud in Turin and concluded it isn’t Jesus.
Company fixed the issue and I have been provided with apology. I decided it wasn't a problem important enough to paint a bulls eye on my back since I am 77 yrs old and ill.
I saw the Shroud in person in Tourin in 1961 and knew it was NOT my LORD Jesus. How?
#1) Jesus Christ is a Jew. The face on the Shroud is Roman.
#2) The Bible says as a result of the torture Jesus received plus the sins God the Father placed on Him, Jesus didn't look human.
#3) Jesus back was ripped open so His internal organs were exposed, the backside
doesn't show any destruction of the back.
Ergo, NOT Jesus Christ.
- Shows based on biblical history are way ofg
User's recommendation: Start thinking Biblically when looking at shows like this.
False information
- - Feb 6, 2024 Black History Month program isn't true.
- - African kings sold people from other tribes into slavery.
- - Slavery did not start in the Southern U.S.
The program's about Black History Month and slavery that aired February 6th 2024 is not entirely true. You should also be explaining that the black kings of Africa sold black people from other tribes into slavery.
It did not start in the Southern States of America. Get your *** straight!no
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified ReviewerPlanned Parenthood ad
- - They oppose a Planned Parenthood fundraising ad.
- - They claim Planned Parenthood aborts babies and call it murder, saying the ad misleads the public.
Im discussed that you would run an ad for Planned Parenthood fund raising. Planned Parenthood aborts babies.
If you think killing unborn babies is something you should support you are condoning murder.
Trying to sell PP as womans rights and health care organization is lying to be the public. These people have killed over 62 million people and you are giving them a platform to solicit money to kill more unborn babies. What youre doing is an abomination.
Do you believe in God? Im waiting for an explanation as to why you think its appropriate to allow an organization that murders babies advertise on you TV station.
Preferred solution: An end to ads for Planned Parenthood.
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified ReviewerWhere's "How the Universe Works" ??
We are not "pissed off",: We just want to know when "How the Universe Works" will return. It's a great program among a lot of *** ones.
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified ReviewerQueja
- - A Colombian Tigo-une subscriber paying for the SCI channel in Spanish complains about BATALLA DE CREADORES repeats and wants new science programs.
Respetados señores soy usuario de Colombia operador Tigo-une pagó por el canal SCI cience Chanel en español y quiero manifestar mi inconformidad con su canal por seguir repitiendo la serie BATALLA DE CREADORES de Brazil
Llevan más de tres años mostrando los mismos y únicos capituló de ese concurso
Por favor mas respeto para con los clientes, queremos buenas, científicas y novedosas programas , no repeticiones o basura tv
Att
Jusn P Celedón
This review is from a real person who provided valid contact information and hasn't been caught misusing, spamming or abusing our website. Check our FAQ
Verified Reviewer |Bad cacophony for background music.. it’s very disturbing and prevents paying attention to vonyent
Noisy awful sounding station your channel sucks content unwatchable because of terrible sound.Sound makes one need too vomit
- Great content
- Awful sounds
Preferred solution: Better directors for channel
User's recommendation: Do not watch or discover for yourself the most horrible founding back ground music you have ever heard.
They don't reply me.....what's the solution?
Why there's so loud background music in every show. Especially in "NASA'S UNEXPECTED FILES"!!?? (IS THIS A SCIENCE CHANNEL OR A MUSIC CHANNEL)
Quite simply, those clowns at The "Science" Channel did not respond in any way.
- - The review questions their use of 'Dr' for a so-called expert; 'Dr' is an honorific for surgeons, physicians, and PhDs in academia.
It was about their use of the term "Dr" in reference to one of their so called experts. The term.Dr is an honorific given to Surgeons, Physicians and PhDs in College and University teaching and research positions.
User's recommendation: Do not watch this channel...it's misleading.
Companies Similar to Science Channel
Thank You for Your Reply! We are processing your message.
Your comment is successfully posted.